> Some crimes have always existed, whilst others are particular to certain periods in history.
Or the definition of what constitutes a crime changed.
For example the BBC could write an article about how in the 21st century judges in the UK are asked to not send rapists to prison anymore or how people who silently pray outside abortion clinic get hefty fines or how people get sent to jail for tweets (but only if they're far-right tweets: far left tweets do get a free pass).
British army veteran convicted of praying silently near abortion clinic
A British army veteran and Christian has been found guilty of praying silently outside of an abortion clinic, with the pro-life advocate facing a near-$12,000 fine over the verdict.
“Today, the court has decided that certain thoughts — silent thoughts — can be illegal in the United Kingdom. That cannot be right,” Smith-Connor said in the legal group’s press release.
> Some crimes have always existed, whilst others are particular to certain periods in history.
Or the definition of what constitutes a crime changed.
For example the BBC could write an article about how in the 21st century judges in the UK are asked to not send rapists to prison anymore or how people who silently pray outside abortion clinic get hefty fines or how people get sent to jail for tweets (but only if they're far-right tweets: far left tweets do get a free pass).
Lucky for us, the BBC isn't in the business of publishing articles on fictional situations.
The BBC is literally government media, run by and for elites, of course it's propaganda. What a sadly naive view.
> What a sadly naive view.
How vexing, I could say the same.
https://www.catholicnewsagency.com/news/259887/british-army-...
British army veteran convicted of praying silently near abortion clinic
Something tells me there's a liiittle bit more to that story than just "he bowed his head, so we put him in jail!"