well I checked the code in their repo，but could not find any snippets as mentioned in the post，which made the claimed perf numbers very suspicious. There was also no cluster configration details in their claim，but you can verify our performance numbers by simply following the deploy steps in the readme.
We wrote a blog explaining why we built another object storage and why it is different: https://fractalbits.com/blog/why-we-built-another-object-sto.... Welcome any useful feedback!
How does it compare to rustfs ? I saw it claims 1580K IOPS: https://zhuanlan.zhihu.com/p/1977752657562182612
well I checked the code in their repo，but could not find any snippets as mentioned in the post，which made the claimed perf numbers very suspicious. There was also no cluster configration details in their claim，but you can verify our performance numbers by simply following the deploy steps in the readme.
Does this support the the range header?
Yes, you can check the code here https://github.com/fractalbits-labs/fractalbits-main/blob/ma.... For each type of requests we have a separate handler for that.
The basic tests are here: https://github.com/fractalbits-labs/fractalbits-main/blob/ma.... We also have fuzz tests internally, which could be open once we feel it is ready.