The industry has spent a decade perfecting "Detection," but "Response" is still stuck in the era of manual runbooks. If your playbooks aren't being tested against synthetic threats weekly, they’re probably already broken.
This is the final piece of my research on autonomous SecOps. It focuses on the Optimization Layer:
Triggering via EBM scoring.
Evaluating outcomes via reward functions.
Optimizing via RL/Genetic Algorithms.
Promoting better versions to production automatically.
I’m curious—how does the HN community feel about "Auto-Promoting" security logic? Is the risk of a "false positive" containment worth the 5x speed increase in response?
The industry has spent a decade perfecting "Detection," but "Response" is still stuck in the era of manual runbooks. If your playbooks aren't being tested against synthetic threats weekly, they’re probably already broken.
This is the final piece of my research on autonomous SecOps. It focuses on the Optimization Layer:
Triggering via EBM scoring.
Evaluating outcomes via reward functions.
Optimizing via RL/Genetic Algorithms.
Promoting better versions to production automatically.
I’m curious—how does the HN community feel about "Auto-Promoting" security logic? Is the risk of a "false positive" containment worth the 5x speed increase in response?