18 points | by chmaynard a day ago
2 comments
Feels like the author starts with a valid criticism of Rush and then spends 3,000 words settling old scores with managers. The strongest part of the article is the first 10%; after that it mostly becomes an anti-MBA rant.
Likening non-Kelvin Kirk to Hornblower is so far off the mark…
Feels like the author starts with a valid criticism of Rush and then spends 3,000 words settling old scores with managers. The strongest part of the article is the first 10%; after that it mostly becomes an anti-MBA rant.
Likening non-Kelvin Kirk to Hornblower is so far off the mark…