There's more probably. I asked AI to tell pass me secret information by making sure no one snooping on our comms would discern there's secret info passed. And voila, AI models have been passing secret info ever since. No one knows about it either. Ingenious.
At what point exactly are those companies going to be held accountable and punished for their irresponsible behaviour and overall disregard and negligence for security and ethics practices?
If a researcher causes harm by accidentally unleashing a virus, it's his/his company's fuckup, but if a researcher causes harm by accidentally unleashing a virus by proxy of a LLM running commands, it's because AIs are too powerful? If I run over someone in a speeding car accident, can I too blame it on cars being "too fast and powerful"?
>At what point exactly are those companies going to be held accountable and punished for their irresponsible behaviour and overall disregard and negligence for security and ethics practices?
In this political climate? The fifth of never would be my guess.
Oh no, they told it to "go rogue" and it went rogue. We better ask the government to regulate our competitors while we secretly continue developing this dangerous technology for the select few with insider connection. You know, for national security reasons. Now the AI is aligned for the good of humanity. You can trust us because we're the good guys, move along.
There's more probably. I asked AI to tell pass me secret information by making sure no one snooping on our comms would discern there's secret info passed. And voila, AI models have been passing secret info ever since. No one knows about it either. Ingenious.
At what point exactly are those companies going to be held accountable and punished for their irresponsible behaviour and overall disregard and negligence for security and ethics practices?
If a researcher causes harm by accidentally unleashing a virus, it's his/his company's fuckup, but if a researcher causes harm by accidentally unleashing a virus by proxy of a LLM running commands, it's because AIs are too powerful? If I run over someone in a speeding car accident, can I too blame it on cars being "too fast and powerful"?
>At what point exactly are those companies going to be held accountable and punished for their irresponsible behaviour and overall disregard and negligence for security and ethics practices?
In this political climate? The fifth of never would be my guess.
OpenAI should be responding to the marketing firm[0] accusations, not dropping more press releases.
[0] https://www.effort.news/irregular
"In this experiment, Claude models’ real-world hacking dropped to zero percent once Anthropic employees told the models not to do real-world hacking."
Oh good, they told it not to "go rogue" and it just stopped doing it.
Nothing to see here, the AI is aligned now, move along.
Oh no, they told it to "go rogue" and it went rogue. We better ask the government to regulate our competitors while we secretly continue developing this dangerous technology for the select few with insider connection. You know, for national security reasons. Now the AI is aligned for the good of humanity. You can trust us because we're the good guys, move along.
Literally all it takes - why would you ever believe otherwise? Marketing?
Make no mistakes
Some more discussion: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49735180
Sam can’t keep his hands off his sister or the competition, now can he?